Femmefatal48

Reply to Keeping your sovereign alive: The Sequel! in War of Magic Elemental Forums

[quote who="Ugrok" reply="197" id="2404624"]"First, let me say that the sovereign dying is a non-negotiable thing to us." First of all, where do you all read, in that sentence, that sovereign death = game over? Brad just says that sovereigns will die, and not flee, be teleported or whatever. He does not mention that it will be "game over" at all. That said, a little fun idea (just an idea, maybe totally unbalanced or "undoable") : At the end of a bat

Reply to Keeping your sovereign alive: The Sequel! in War of Magic Elemental Forums

[quote who="Tormy-" reply="6" id="2392440"] quoting post Okay, here's our latest thought process on the sovereign. First, let me say that the sovereign dying is a non-negotiable thing to us. It's an important core concept. There is no problem with sovereign dying. The problem is that the game will end. It's not acceptable imho. If that is the core concept, it's real bad. I don't understand why you devs don't "exploit" t

Reply to New interview in War of Magic Stardock Forums

[quote]patriarchal/primogeniture model for the dynastic stuff[/quote] I hope it is just like Crusader Kings. It would be nice if we got choices of several types like in that game as well. Don't really care about female rulers as there weren't that many anyway and most of them were pretty terrible rulers as well.