Anthony R Anthony R

Lets face it Win 8 Sux

Lets face it Win 8 Sux

Microsoft need to get serious about making Operating systems in the future and needs to give me at least 1 good reason to switch from Win 7 which is the best Operating system I've used to something new. With Win 8 I have nothing but reasons NOT to switch. Get serious people.

1,278,529 views 418 replies
Reply #251 Top

Quoting vStyler, reply 250
Her camera wasnt supported neither was her printer..

and that is the same problem that plagued Vista. 

It was NOT the fault of the OS, but rather the manufacturer's failure to produce drivers.

Reply #252 Top

Quoting Phoon, reply 251

Quoting vStyler, reply 250Her camera wasnt supported neither was her printer..

and that is the same problem that plagued Vista. 

It was NOT the fault of the OS, but rather the manufacturer's failure to produce drivers.

 

Although depending on the age of the product in question, they may not make any drivers for it anymore.

 

If you are unlucky and have to stay with the new OS you can just spend several hundred € for new hardware, too.

 

 

Now, that makes upgrading a really great idea. ;P

Reply #253 Top

Quoting ARESIV, reply 252
If you are unlucky and have to stay with the new OS you can just spend several hundred € for new hardware, too.

Now, that makes upgrading a really great idea.

and that is the hardware manufacturer's way of forcing you to buy new hardware. Not the fault of the OS manufacturer at all.

I see it all the time with various software vendors that require Java. The assholes refuse to update their product to be able to use a newer version of Java. They either want you to buy an updated version of their software or simply don't want to update what they do have. Yet another required application on the same pc requires a higher version of Java to operate. 

Reply #254 Top

Quoting Phoon, reply 251
Quoting vStyler, reply 250Her camera wasnt supported neither was her printer..

and that is the same problem that plagued Vista. 

It was NOT the fault of the OS, but rather the manufacturer's failure to produce drivers.

I liked Vista and I thought it had a lot of problems.  Even long after SP1 it was very glitchy (forgetting folder settings, among other things) and I think some of it persisted even after SP2 (though that cleaned up most of it IIRC.)

That's why people were so happy with 7 IMO, even though its only real claim to fame was being more efficient and slightly less annoying.

Reply #255 Top

Quoting Savyg, reply 254
I liked Vista and I thought it had a lot of problems.

I liked Vista as well... and once SP1 resolved the folder 'copy/move' issues I was pretty much happy with its performance.  Let's just say that I had very few, if any real issues with it after SP1.  I have Vista Home Premium SP2 x64 on a 'visitors machine' and it runs like a dream.  Occasionally I have a dabble on it and keep it updated, etc... though if my little bird is correct it will lose support mid-2013, meaning I'll disconnect it from the net and just use it as an in-house entertainment hub.

Oh, and another reason Win 7 sux bilge water... I has ter go upstairs if'n I want ta use it. :-"

Reply #257 Top

Quoting Savyg, reply 256

Quoting starkers, reply 256though if my little bird is correct it will lose support mid-2013

Your little bird needs a fact check http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/lifecycle[/quote]

Maybe so, but he was/is a Microsoft employee, and and maybe things have since changed with the release of Windows 8 and its slow uptake.

One thing I do know, we cannot purchase it here in Australia anymore, and Win 7 has become rarer than hens teeth since Win 8 hit the shelves.  Major retailers don't/can't stock it, and while some smaller PC stores may have a copy or two laying around, even those are far and few between and often quite high in price.  Now that was the premise of my question to the MS employee, why was this so, and that was his response to me, that primary support would end mid-2013 for XP and late 2013 for Vista, to free up resources for future development.

Reply #258 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 257
Now that was the premise of my question to the MS employee, why was this so, and that was his response to me, that primary support would end mid-2013 for XP and late 2013 for Vista, to free up resources for future development.

Starkers....anything in conflict with the info linked in #256 is either wrong or covered by an NDA....AND wrong....;)

An MS 'Employee' out-in-the-sticks [Australia] would be unlikely to be privy to anything beyond the formal stance as listed.

A sales-rep has no other purpose/function other than to increase sales [his success] so there is going to be a self-imposed fudging of any reality in order to steer someone towards a new sale/upgrade.

Treat any comments from sales people as dubious at best.

Goes for any industry....;)

Reply #259 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 258
An MS 'Employee' out-in-the-sticks [Australia]

As stated earlier, the person I spoke with was from the US, here to work with/assess various aspects of the Australian market.  I can't vouch for the veracity of his comments, but that's what he said.

Anyhow, Win 8 is still the better OS... so I don't care if the others go away [support-wise] ;P

Reply #260 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 258
Maybe so, but he was/is a Microsoft employee, and and maybe things have since changed with the release of Windows 8 and its slow uptake.

No, but it did change BEFORE Windows 8.  I believe the original plan was 2013, but that changed since the contrast between XP and Vistas support end date was ridiculous.

Reply #262 Top

Ah, Jafo, memories. Altering the DOS prompt in form and color was fun also. ;-)

 

PROMPT $P$G$E[37m
Reply #263 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 236

Quoting Roloccolor, reply 235The thing with the mobile phone Jafo i dont have a new smartphone never had i have seen the desktop or the screen of some modern phones sure they have a similar look but whats so bad about it?

Not having/using one probably says it all... What they have is a [comparative] small screen interface where a person's fingers are the limiting factor on what you can do with them.  Multi apps on one screen eventually become utterly unworkable...so the trend is to switch out of them...more like hide lateral [virtual] desktops and only ever see one thing at a time.

In simple terms there are computer users out there for whom that is utterly pointless and unworkable as an interface in which to work.

More-over ...optimizing a GUI for a touch-screen suits the phone, certainly...but will never suit all PC use.

Touch screens are handy for POS transactions .... but finger-painting in Photoshop will not happen.

 

Exactly my thoughts.  Do i have such large clumsy fingers or is everyone born now with specially adapted piano player hands? It takes me ages to surf on a thing like that. Either you can't read what's on it without a magnifier or you need to constantly zoom in/out. And let's not even begin with site incompatibilities. Using it outside in the sun is totally impossible even at brightest battery draining display. 

The likelyhood i'll do an excel spreadsheet on them is zero, writing a document more then 140 chars is a daunting task, etc etc.

The only way it could work is if the screen was 17" minimum and had a proper keyboard. Oh wait, we have those. Laptops.

Petrossa's 1st law of technology: Not all progress is an improvement.

Reply #264 Top

Quoting moshi, reply 262
no changes since at least October 2010

http://web.archive.org/web/20101030031001/http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/lifecycle?

the only thing that has changed is that consumer versions qualify for extendend support as well.

And that happened in 2012.

clearly they forgot to update the top of the page

Reply #265 Top

Quoting petrossa, reply 264

 Exactly my thoughts.  Do i have such large clumsy fingers or is everyone born now with specially adapted piano player hands? It takes me ages to surf on a thing like that. Either you can't read what's on it without a magnifier or you need to constantly zoom in/out....

This is the second time you reference 'piano players' in this thread.  Maybe you missed my first reply to the first 'piano players' reference back on page 7 (reply #163) so here is the gist of it again.......

While you may be 'used to' a PC, this generation is increasingly not so.  They are in fact 'used to' phones/tablets by now.  My children (all grown already) can text and surf for webpages on their mobile devices just as fast (if not faster) than anyone else can on a PC.  Fact of life these days....



Quoting petrossa, reply 264

Petrossa's 1st law of technology: Not all progress is an improvement.

Life's 1st law of life:  Those not in forward motion get left behind.

Reply #266 Top

Quoting Savyg, reply 264

Quoting moshi, reply 262no changes since at least October 2010

http://web.archive.org/web/20101030031001/http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/lifecycle?

the only thing that has changed is that consumer versions qualify for extendend support as well.

And that happened in 2012.

clearly they forgot to update the top of the page

I see no point in debating/arguing the 'supposed' end of support dates.  Clearly Micrsoft is disappointed in the slow uptake of Windows 8 and is seeking solutions to migrate as many people as possible over to the new system.  The heavily discounted pricing didn't work - and MS wants more Win 8 users to reduce its support load - so if a second attempt at discount pricing fails mid-2013, then MS may just be forced to employ heavier-handed measures.

Perhaps 'my little bird' wasn't too far off the mark after all. :S

Reply #267 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 267

I see no point in debating/arguing the 'supposed' end of support dates.

I have no idea what there is to argue.  People were annoyed that XP got special treatment, MS fixed it.  There's not much to discuss.

http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-vista-consumer-support-extended-to-2017

2012.  I could find many more articles from 2012 saying the same thing if you like.

Reply #268 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 266
if a second attempt at discount pricing fails mid-2013, then MS may just be forced to employ heavier-handed measures.

 

I guess that's one of the reasons why I made sure all my latest hardware could run OS X on Multibeast. This way if MS becomes heavy handed insisting on my use of an OS that I dislike I have other options.

Reply #269 Top

Quoting Anthony, reply 268
I guess that's one of the reasons why I made sure all my latest hardware could run OS X on Multibeast.

I've never used OS-X so I have no idea what it's like, but from what I can ascertain, I'd be able to run it on my rig if I were to purchase a copy.

Thing is, how does one go about doing that.... isn't Apple highly protective of its OS, and where it goes?  Like does'nt one have to provide evidence of ownership of an Apple PC to eligible to purchase OS-X?  I ask because I have no idea.  Like the last time I made tentative enquires into getting an iMac at an Apple store, I did ask about purchasing just an OS, and was told no, I couldn't.

Reply #270 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 266

Quoting Savyg, reply 264
Quoting moshi, reply 262no changes since at least October 2010

http://web.archive.org/web/20101030031001/http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/lifecycle?

the only thing that has changed is that consumer versions qualify for extendend support as well.

And that happened in 2012.

clearly they forgot to update the top of the page

I see no point in debating/arguing the 'supposed' end of support dates.  Clearly Micrsoft is disappointed in the slow uptake of Windows 8 and is seeking solutions to migrate as many people as possible over to the new system.  The heavily discounted pricing didn't work - and MS wants more Win 8 users to reduce its support load - so if a second attempt at discount pricing fails mid-2013, then MS may just be forced to employ heavier-handed measures.

Perhaps 'my little bird' wasn't too far off the mark after all.

 

you think MS is going to end support for Windows Vista/7 earlier if people don't buy Windows 8?

completely alienating existing customers ... brilliant idea from a business perspective. if you really believe that it would be smart to invest every single dollar you have in Red Hat stock right now.

Reply #271 Top

Quoting the_Monk, reply 266

...

While you may be 'used to' a PC, this generation is increasingly not so.  They are in fact 'used to' phones/tablets by now.  My children (all grown already) can text and surf for webpages on their mobile devices just as fast (if not faster) than anyone else can on a PC.  Fact of life these days....


...
Life's 1st law of life:  Those not in forward motion get left behind.

 

 

And if they are happy with their mobile phone..... why bother buying a PC at all? You dont use your car the way you use your computer... and so why should I use my computer like a phone?

 

Believe in Mircosofts marketing all you want.... a mobile phone GUI on a desktop operating system is downright stupid.

 

As far leaving behind.... this is such a PATHETIC argument.... we speak about an OS here.... not some treck in the wild west. And there is very little consequence in avoiding Win 8 all together. In fact, bad sales may make MS revert back to common sense.

 

 

Quoting starkers, reply 267

Quoting Savyg, reply 264
Quoting moshi, reply 262no changes since at least October 2010

http://web.archive.org/web/20101030031001/http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/lifecycle?

the only thing that has changed is that consumer versions qualify for extendend support as well.

And that happened in 2012.

clearly they forgot to update the top of the page

I see no point in debating/arguing the 'supposed' end of support dates.  Clearly Micrsoft is disappointed in the slow uptake of Windows 8 and is seeking solutions to migrate as many people as possible over to the new system.  The heavily discounted pricing didn't work - and MS wants more Win 8 users to reduce its support load - so if a second attempt at discount pricing fails mid-2013, then MS may just be forced to employ heavier-handed measures.

Perhaps 'my little bird' wasn't too far off the mark after all.

 

It is clear to me that you have not the slighest idea in the world how economy works....

 

The CUSTOMER.... and NOT THE COMPANY chooses what is done.... and what product is the future. 

 

So, if Microsoft uses your "Heavier handed measures" it may soon find out that the customer is capable of much more severe measures. And unlike Microsoft the customer can do this as long as he wants.

 

Actually, with the current quite unimpressive scale of sales, there is a descent change that support for Windows 7 is extended even further.

 

 

You are dearly mistaken, to believe that Microsoft can force something onto people and companies that said people and companies dont want. Welcome to the free market. If your product sucks, you improve it... or leave the market.

 

Which might not be too bad after all.... I dont think anyone would miss Microsoft..... besides.... even a market share drop down to 30 % would wo wonders to the OS market..... and would place them to the place where they belong.

 

 

I dont see companies moving to Windows 8 any time soon.... as for them... there is no advantage..... only cost and high loss of productivity until people learn to use the retarded GUI. Similar to most end users.

 

 

Reply #272 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 269
I've never used OS-X so I have no idea what it's like, but from what I can ascertain, I'd be able to run it on my rig if I were to purchase a copy.

You wouldn't be able to run it. OSX is coded to only run on Apple hardware. There is a way to run OSX on non-Apple hardware but it involves hacks and runarounds to do so.

Reply #273 Top

Quoting kona0197, reply 272

Quoting starkers, reply 269I've never used OS-X so I have no idea what it's like, but from what I can ascertain, I'd be able to run it on my rig if I were to purchase a copy.

You wouldn't be able to run it. OSX is coded to only run on Apple hardware. There is a way to run OSX on non-Apple hardware but it involves hacks and runarounds to do so.

I read in a magazine that if your hardware is reasonably modern and your specs are decent, OS-X will run on a regular PC with a Bootcamp type program.  It was a while ago now and I'll have to look up the article again, but it said that the program performs all the necessary actions to run OS-X on a PC.

Reply #274 Top

Bootcamp is a program that allows Windows 7 to run an Apple hardware, not the other way around.

Reply #275 Top

You can use Multibeast to run it... http://tonymacx86.blogspot.com/2010/02/multibeast-ultimate-post-installation.html

But why would you be interested in such issues Starkers? You will be using whatever Microsoft creates and you will be praying that they cut off all support to us knuckle dragging bitter clingers who refuse to adapt.