cammagno74

1.08 ETA?

1.08 ETA?

Any news about this?

I know that it was supposed to be internally checked today, but when is it supposed to become available?

526,016 views 193 replies
Reply #176 Top

Quoting wayninja, reply 95



Quoting Frogboy,
reply 88

Quoting wayninja, reply 87
If the info is elsewhere on this, I apologize, but can we expect books 2 and 3 to be more significant in terms of gameplay hours than book 1 (which took me about 2 hours, and I was taking my sweet time)?

I'm not sure how they will work out.  I'm writing Book 2 and 3 myself and the tools are somewhat more powerful now than when Book 1 was made.  The campaigns weren't really designed to be a major feature of the game so it really depends on what the community is looking for.


 

If I look at in terms of someone who doesn't get it for 'free' and am paying 20 dollars for it (which I know is only true for book 3), shouldn't I expect it to deliver 20 dollars worth of entertainment?  If the actual book 2/3 campaign doesn't deliver more than an hour or 2 of replay, why should I purchase it?

 

I'm not trying to criticise, I'm just honestly wondering what will be in these future books that make them 'worthy' expansions/addons, or is it just too soon to tell?

The way I read,  it is going to have a lot more to them than just campaign elements. At least I hope it is just not campaigns. I'm not a big fan of liner campaigns, I'm more a Sandbox sort of person. 

Reply #177 Top

I really have no idea why so many people dislike campaigns. I love them.  :sick:

Reply #178 Top

Quoting solidsmooky, reply 177
I really have no idea why so many people dislike campaigns. I love them. 

I like campaigns too - but only if they are presented well and have an interesting story. If Stardock does not have an adequate budget to pump into production values then I'd rather get an expansive skirmish mode.

Reply #179 Top

Quoting solidsmooky, reply 177
I really have no idea why so many people dislike campaigns. I love them. 

 

I like campaigns too... just not the one attached to Elemental.  The player is given ZERO choice about anything, its do this then that, then this and use this army and that city, etc...  I loved the campaign in Kings Bounty and HOMM, but both gave you at least some freedom.

Reply #180 Top

To anyone on here concerned about whether Stardock will get Elemental straightened out, or considering never buying another SD title, I highly suggest you find a copy of the original Galactic Civilizations, The Original release of GalCiv 2, and GalCiv 2 Ultimate. All 3 are awesome 4x games, but you really need to see what happens between these versions.

In all fairness, The first one had rough edges and limited player options. Fun, but I went back to MOM and MOO 2 after a month or 2.

The Original release of GalCiv2 added a ton of player options, and fun by extension, but still felt rough/unpolished.

2 Expansions later you get Ultimate. Rough edges gone, nothing but pure shiny goodness.

This is what Stardock does. It is a small developer with BIG ideas, not just in the games they develop, but HOW they develop them. Elemental is, as many point out, a diamond in the rough. In time it WILL shine.

 

Lord Xia, I don't have a pony, but you can have my High Horse. I'm getting down now...

+1 Loading…
Reply #181 Top

Quoting Lantros, reply 171
I´m here for 2 weeks and i dont care about what was on the table weeks/month/years ago. I dont wont total war -battles. Maybe this battles look epic, but i really dont like the gameplay, the rush and in the end its always a big bunch of pixels. 

I like battles in a HoMM Style (never played MoM) and thats what i get.   

I'm glad you like it (honestly). But then you got the game you paid for, I didn't. Sure, I could have gone for the refund, but by the time that was an option I had invested too much of my time to just walk away. Besides, I still had hope for the stratigic part of the game.

I don't know why you would use the word rush in relation to total war battles though. To me they are almost painfully slow, with the placing of your troops, moving towards the enemy, long battles, persuing fleeing enemies, etc. Even when you win effortlessly it takes a long time. Sure you have to act quickly sometimes, but only battles where you are evenly matched in strength or badly outnumbered require you to monitor everything closely (at least in Rome:TW).

I would have been quite happy if they had met somewhere halfway between total war and the current combat system.

Quoting arstal, reply 173

I think he meant the real-time tactical, which got dumped.

Probably for the best that it is, this game is enough of a Frankenstein right now as it is, that getting some coherency is needed, and once it's achieved the game should really start to shine.,

I hope you are right. The combat system needs a lot of work before I'd call it solid. And it will need complemented by the magic system in a good way to make tactical combat even remotely interesting (to me). By that I mean magic that isn't just used for summons and direct damage spells.

Reply #182 Top

exactly - rough diamond - its still shiney ! - im still waiting with anticipation for a patch :D

Reply #183 Top

Quoting Serapth, reply 179



Quoting solidsmooky,
reply 177
I really have no idea why so many people dislike campaigns. I love them.  

I like campaigns too... just not the one attached to Elemental.  The player is given ZERO choice about anything, its do this then that, then this and use this army and that city, etc...  I loved the campaign in Kings Bounty and HOMM, but both gave you at least some freedom.

I agree, you need to have options in a mission to make it interesting. Like the example someone made where you need to get access to the only harbor on the map (was that in this thread, I'm not sure). You could make the victory condition that you sovereign has to be in that city for 10 turns (so you can't sneak past the enemy's defenses, you need time to build the ships), and then leave the player free to choose how he achieves that. He could ally with his enemy, thus getting access. Or he can conquer the city. Or he can incite a revolution and then make a deal with the new leader. Or he can open a gate to the underworld, unleashing a horde of unspeakable horrors that leave the lands devastated, thus allowing the player to rebuild a harbor of his own at the location. And there should be side quests, some to help you with your main mission, some just to keep you busy while building your forces or something.

Reply #184 Top

Btw, this thread has gotten waaaaaaaaaaaaaay off-topic :P

Reply #185 Top

Quoting Satrhan, reply 181

I would have been quite happy if they had met somewhere halfway between total war and the current combat system.

Satrhan, I think you'd really enjoy this post here by Frogboy: https://forums.elementalgame.com/343449

Frogboy specifically mentions Total War Type Battles in the last sentence.

Reply #186 Top

Seriously, today looking like a possibility?

Reply #187 Top

Quoting Frogboy, reply 140
Yea, we're not going for epic tactical battles. MOM is our influence, not total war.

Case closed, apparantly.

Reply #188 Top

Right now, for this game, I think we all agree that quality is far more important than a timeline.  Make it good....make it right....make it work the first time.:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Reply #189 Top

Quoting Serapth, reply 138



Quoting Raven X,
reply 104

Quoting Frogboy, reply 88
 so it really depends on what the community is looking for.


Psst, here's what the community is looking for

https://forums.elementalgame.com/396516/page/7/#2772936


 

 

Let me just say as a member of the community, I overwhelmingly and completely with all of my heart and soul DO NOT WANT THIS.

It simply wouldn't work, not without a complete engine redesign.  Once that engine redesigned happened, it would be a game I do not want to play.  A turn based game is tactical in nature, especially a turn based game with heroic units.  Moving things to a massive scale would simply drown you in minutiae.

That and there exists such a long list of things that need to be fixed or implemented ( like game crashes, game balancing, AI strengthening and Multiplayer ) that the linked idea is actually harmfully unfocused.

 

So please put me down as an epically opposed vote, in case Stardock actually entertains these silly ideas.

 
][quote]https://forums.elementalgame.com/396516/page/7/#2772936

 

I like the idea. I do think that if a battle is started all units in adjacent squres and the same square should be involved like in other TBS games like MoM and AOW.  And yes it works well in those games and can work in this game.

Reply #190 Top

Quoting Frogboy, reply 140
Yea, we're not going for epic tactical battles. MOM is our influence, not total war.

Ok but allowing all stackes adjacent to the square being attacked to enter TB combat  would not be Total Warish it would be AOW/MoMish.

I'm not talking about the double the army size part that is a different issue all togather.

Reply #191 Top

Quoting solidsmooky, reply 177
I really have no idea why so many people dislike campaigns. I love them. 

Because campaigns in just about all TBS/RTS/SHOOTERS are boring because the tend to be linear which is never fun IMO. I perfer to create my on "campaign" if you will. Where I'll have no idea how it ends and does not have the restrictiveness of normal campaigns. I perfer a story to be organic (sandbox) as opposed to stagnat (Linear campaign.)

Reply #192 Top

Quoting Frogboy, reply 140
Yea, we're not going for epic tactical battles. MOM is our influence, not total war.

 

Good to hear!!!  Thanks Brad!

Reply #193 Top

Quoting Bellack, reply 191



Quoting solidsmooky,
reply 177
I really have no idea why so many people dislike campaigns. I love them. 



Because campaigns in just about all TBS/RTS/SHOOTERS are boring because the tend to be linear which is never fun IMO. I perfer to create my on "campaign" if you will. Where I'll have no idea how it ends and does not have the restrictiveness of normal campaigns. I perfer a story to be organic (sandbox) as opposed to stagnat (Linear campaign.)

You make an interesting comparison when you share how you view sandbox games, yet don't belittle how important storytelling is (it'd not be the venerable thing it is without being a major part of human creativity).  I agree linear campaigns aren't worth the effort it takes to make them, but they don't have to be so simplistic.  There's hardly any ingenuity required to port ideas like the quest trees from MMOs and games like Morrowind (which nailed the epic story feel).  We know the sandbox (and by extension, the toolset) is versatile; how tough would it be to capture some of those winning techniques in the TBS format?  It'd certainly scratch that itch so many have to experience/play a good story, and it would elevate this game.

Of course, I hope the sandbox mode remains a priority until it's challenging and smooth (like the finished GalCiv product), but there's also nothing wrong with sending Brad an epic quest (turnabout and all).