Stardock Forums
Who Do U Think Is The Admins of This Site! Try to be precise if you can.
"Is the Admins"?
Specifically and precisely, they work for or are volunteers for Stardock.
You're welcome. 
Very true but, it is hard to become one unless you are really on everyday doing everything possible to become one then ya they could look at ya. I know! But I was hopeing for a name even thou I think they'll lock this one two.
Aren't you the same Jm that posted 2 threads one after the other to start flamewars!
Dude.....get a life!
Who cares who the admins are....and if by admin you mean moderators! They're written at the bottom of each forum category!
The others were obvious flamebait (no content, only an attempt to start controversy) in direct opposition of the stickied rule of this forum. There's no particular reason to lock this thread, though.
The peeps who try keeping the forums from turning into a mess of flaming rubbish totally off context! Big Up the Admin especially if they volunteer thier time to the cause 
On the shaky assumption that you wish to continue blogging here, you would do well to cool it. The rules are pretty simple and you do not have complete freedom of speech here - it is a privately owned website & service - you wouldn't be the first to be banished if you choose to ignore those rules.
Ba, I don't really care for the admins (what I mean is that I don't care whether they post or reply on the fourms). It is nice to have them there, keeps everything in check but I think we could survive without them. It is like insurance.
Ya you all are right and yes I did post the two flamewars posts as you guys call it and yes I did read the rules but as I said before almost every rule people have have something that conflicts with the other or cancels itself out because they find a fault in it like the constitution and this own websites little rules below.
This:
Stardock does not control the Content posted via the Service and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such Content. You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable.
and these:
You agree to not use the Service to:
(a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, pornographic, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
conflict with each other. Now tell me this so I get this right which is it?
The first is not a "right" of yours. It's just that Stardock doesn't screen every post before it gets posted.
The second is what applies to you.
There's no conflict.
How exactly do those conflict with eachother? The first one warns that you may encounter stuff you don't like here, and the second one says that you musn't post "unlawful, harmful, threatening, etc.." content.
Dude it says it right there as you said it. They warn; like how they have signs next to a body of water warning you that they who ever it may be if not accompanied by a lifeguard is not subjected to any fault or lawsuits. So on and so forth with this one as well.
There are many forums on the internet dedicated to saying what you want without the fear of getting locked and kicked from the forum. These are the places you should go to discuss what your heart is feeling about the general state of play the illusion of this world is to you.
Keep gaming forums for Gaming and issues surrounding the applications and problems we have within the context of the forum, i agree there is a need for a little light sided discussion about Off Topic conversation, But head to the Internets other Forums for the Deep and Meaningful.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
GalCiv2 Forums
Sins Forums
JoeUser Forums