No Stardock published game that has had a pre-order beta has ever gotten less than a meta score of 85.
Does this mean getting a "B" is a goal? I understand an 85 is not at 75 or a 50, but it is not a 90 or 95 either. Frankly, the whole ratings thing is, well, overrated. A letter from one site, a number on whatever scale( 5, 9, 17 1/2, 99 and 2/3s) from another, and maybe a star or thumbs up or some random vegetable from wherever all based on different systems or caterogries of evaluation.
By now, ratings seem so unreliable that I know I do not use or trust them since they really don't provide any real information. Polls are ok, in getting feedback and on occasion, a pro/cons list. But as for a rating, you might as well give it an ice cream flavor as much as an overall score. Did you know that:
No Stardock published game that has had a pre-order beta has ever gotten less than a chocolate.
?
That's more like it!
As far as that goes, even PA weighs in on it here: http://www.penny-arcade.com/2002/10/28/i-give-it-an-862315/
Any way, I played your game, thought it was fun and wanted to help you make it a product I would buy. I'd like to offer help in testing, but I am not willing to be charged to help you make money on something that is still in the works.