Not officially. If you're interested in at least trying to get any issues with emulation ironed out though, the beta is the time to do that.

Keep in mind that you'll have to learn the new OS and perhaps convert some documents to a format that works better with the new OS.

My recommencation is that, for any OS you decide to switch to, you upgrade on a new or different machine from your primary machine. A simple replacement of the OS on the old machine might not be so simple - you may have to worry about driver compatibility and OS performance requirements. A new machine, especially one that comes with the OS already installed, won't have as many troubles as older machines.

It would be great if it suppots other OSes, although honestly Windows tends to be the OS of choice for gamers.

My personal experience is that emulators and virtualizers have very poor support for 3D graphics. I think Wine has some support and VMWare has some experimental support. Virtual PC emulates an ancient S3 card that has no 3D acceleration at all. Supporting emulators could be pretty difficult.

If i'm a gamer, i just use windows.

If i'm a professional + gamer i install windows + Linux or MacOS.

Emulators or implementation of the Win32 libraries just to be able to play some games gives you more problems than just installing 2 OS on the same machine.

Another thread (Journals) predicts a release due date for October 1st.

Good news, made my day. There is still a large fanbase of *cough* today, grieving about the fact that EA holds the rights and nobody was allowed to develop a successor of this great game. I'm looking forward to not-MOM.

I played MoM for a few weeks earlier this summer. It's as good as ever -- almost more fun than Civ4 even though Civ4 is so much better designed and balanced.  It's just so much fun to summon a Fire Elemental to fight those halfling slingers. I really wish Hasbro had sold you the license (even though 80% of the stuff in MoM is cribbed from Magic and D&D).

What sysreqs will be required to max the graphics at 60 and 75 FPS on 1280x1024 and 1920x1200?   I'll be surprised if performance can get better then with a E8400, a 8800GTS (G92) and 4GB DDR2 800MHz RAM. I'm prepared to upgrade to the latest graphicscard (the generation after 4870 and GTX 280) but I haven't heard about a game that heavily taxes the cpu since SupCom.

Will a Q9450 be better for not-MoM then a E8400 with overclocking factored in the equation?

 

Good news, made my day. There is still a large fanbase of *cough* today, grieving about the fact that EA holds the rights and nobody was allowed to develop a successor of this great game.

EA holds the rights to MoM??   You sure about that??   Brad said it was Atari they were trying to buy them from. And if Atari wouldn't sell the MoM rights to Stardock for 100.000$ then I don't see why they would do it to EA. Plus, why on earth would EA be interested in the rights to a game in a nichegenre that consoleretards know nothing about?

Sorry, I mixed it up with Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri (SMAC/SMAX). EA holds the rights to SMAC/X.

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=10

I'm not sure if it's the best source, but it does appear that even 15% is bigger than any other OS. Mac OS is at almost 8% with the source I'm using. All of the other OSes drop off quickly after Mac OS and are barely worh mentioning.

Hence why I was careful enough to say "non-Microsoft OSes." Sure, it's not taking over the market by storm, but it doesn't seem very many people are defecting to other OSes. They're just staying with XP and not upgrading.

If you note the trends, Vista is still a growing OS, and XP is still a shrinking OS. It does appear that replacement is happening, it's just not hapenning as fast as some people would like.

But yeah, it's happening rather slowly, and when the next OS from Microsoft launches we may have a 3 way battle between the Microsoft OSes.

Possibly. Depends on when they launch their next OS and how much it's delayed. I'm not terribly confident they can launch this next OS on time.

I think it is great news and I am glad that the company is expanding beyond Galactic Civilizations. What I mean by that is that Stardock can work on one genre (Fantasy TBG) and upgrade the technology behind what drives that game then revisit the other genre (Space Sim TBG (GalCiv XX)) and implement the newer technology for that game years later. I enjoy when a game that is released reflects greater leaps in technology and innovations. I have played too many games where a newer version of a game in a series are merely a year or a little more apart and the only real difference between the newer game and the last version are slightly enhanced graphics and tweaks to the AI and interface.

Im personally glad that there will be a multiplayer available, my friends and I have been waiting for something like this. As far as the AI being addressed by seth. Im only a novice game programmer (hobbyist) but my understanding with games utilizing multicores, the AI has plenty of room for improvement without effecting performance. I guess I dont understand how implementing multiplayer will effect the game at all. There are some videos at Intel's website about games and multicore. This seems to especially have positive impacts on game performance and so on. My understanding is that you can now use 1 core for the graphics, 1 core for AI, 1 core for ect. ect. This is great news and I can imaging this will allow for newer larger, epic games to be developed (I hope).

I also agree that the Metaverse has a certain appeal to it and would hate to see it go away and rather would like to see it improved. Such as the current scoring system and scoring for certain criteria. I think its a shame that if a player wants to play an epic game on immense that he / she are penalized for it because of the time frame it takes to clear a map size such as immense. I personally wish there were bigger maps but thats another topic.

I think its great that GC III is in the works and I cannot wait to see some screens of the early work (including the fantasy game). Stardock I think you guys are great and I have much respect for all of you. Keep up the good work and I will pre order the fantasy game as soon as it becomes available to support your efforts. What separates you from the rest is that it is apparent that you care about your customers and get invovled in the community and care about what we think. Rock on.

Later
Aaron

Why not combine Galciv 3 with a Spore type editor.

Allow us to design our own races and buildings like that to use in our games. Give us emotional connections to our people. Make us care.

Obviously the spaceship editor is already in, but perhaps make a version thats less blocky and edgy. More round softness. Organic tech ships.

Looking forward to all improvements and beta and GCIII when ever it is released. Please, Please no multiplayer if it detracts in any way from the SP version. SP is the only way I play which is what makes this game the best of the best. So please no multiplayer.