Ok, so when I first read little-whip's "admission" to breaching the TOS, I thought it was like when pirates reveal that they have stolen software.

It turns out that little-whip did not breach the TOS, and I wonder why an admission was necessary in the first place. Because admission was the purpose of a certain comment "she" made, I figured the rest that went with it was justification for the transgression. I was wrong. Weird. Seriously, that almost never happens .

Since "she" has blacklisted me, I am unable to post this on one of her articles. Since I blacklisted her in return (), she will not be able to post on this article. (Check on one of hers for a response.)

Please note that the chief purpose of that article containing the allegation was to discourage giving out personal information. I still stand by that