I have to agree with the whole campaign idea. If there is so much history and lore why not build on that and have the campaign revolve around that.
I would also like to see more ships, mainly capital class, and none of this balance nonsense. No war has ever been balanced, i don't recall Churchill ringing Hitler and saying "no no fair that you have V2 rockets and we have nothing to match it so don't use them." Want to prove yourself as a true strategest then use a weaker race to win

You might have an inkling of an argument if this were a war simulator. It isn't. It isn't made for realism. If you like unfair fights and that feels more 'realistic' to you, you can load up against 9 Unfair AI and go at it. You also have the option to go against 9 other people if you really wanted. You also have the option to mod a race into oblivion. But most people don't like being walked all over by something imbalanced, and similarly dislike walking all over something using imbalance.

You also used a terrible example. The Axis powers were the 'weaker race' of WWII. They didn't win or even come close because after a certain point, the odds were against them to an enormous degree.

Additionally, war is not a platform to 'test' strategy in real life. It's a physical and political struggle where people die, are seriously injured, and literally lose their sanity. You have imperfect information and must act on that information, and inevitably something will go wrong (or right). It's like playing chess without being able to see the other player's pieces or only knowing in general where some pieces are.

Speaking of which, chess and Go and other games like them are real tests of strategy. Everyone knows what's going on, everyone knows the rules of the game, everyone is evenly matched so the winner is, by definition, the best player - the best strategist - and it has nothing to do with luck, doesn't depend on third-party information etc.

The order of players selected before game start should match the player order in the map's .galaxy files, so you can pick what planet/system you start in, instead of it being randomised (if the map allows it/has player numbers assigned to starting planets).

I am with "monkeyboy". I would love to see a single player campaign.

Yes, yes, Ironclad has already stated that they want to do a campaign, but because they don't like standard RTS campaigns, we won't see their take on it until the expansion.

-HM

Just remember that the game only came out in February...6 months isn't a whole lot of time to start agitating for an expansion

Oh and another thought is a strike team capability, a ship can launch a strike team pod at another ship and depending on chance or whatever, the strike team could take over an enemy ship. (maybe even a capital ship if a whole army of pods were launched). Just a thought... 

Im gonna be unrealistic and say immplement some form of campaign in the current game, supposing its in the form of heaps of text missions from each faction, imagine the scope of a campaign if you made it so basic?? you could through time have thousands of text faction missions and I would rather see content than glitz tbh because you have massive scope and it would be much easier to put big scripted text campaigns per faction in every few months, you could have an ongoing saga , theres an idea for your business model because if people know you are adding a few lines of text campaign per patch you are going to get constant sales, look at gcviv 2 its still selling yet and this way would be even better

I would like it, if making a fleet, real meant something. Right now, it is only a replacemeet for hotkeys, with focues fire, engagement range and fleet Cohesion. It also addeds a retreat command, and a fleet squadron Mangement button(which with all the small ships, is real nice).

So here what I would do.

A fleet, is a group of ships that have a centralized command system, which allows them to fight as a group, right? So why not make, it so when they are in a fleet, that they have a improved command system.

Improved system

Make it so, when you turn on/off auto cast for any ship, you also turn off auto cast for all other ships, of the same type. This is one of the things, that Sins, has a problem with. You have to select each ship of the same type, and turn off the same abilitie for all those ships in the fleet, which given the number of ships, can lead to a lot of time, focues on micro, instead of fleet control.

So the people, who use hot keys can turn off the auto cast for one of the Serevun Overseer's Reactive Nanite Armor, with out turning off the auto cast, for all the other Secevun Overseer, with in that hot key group. But if that Serven Overseer was in a fleet, then all Serevun Overseer's Reactive Nanite Armor auto cast, would be turned off.

Second, I would add that if I select the fleet, and hit the button for an defensive abilitie(Reactive Nanite Armor) then all ships of with that abilitie would use it at the same time. There would have to be a fleet AI in place, so that they did not just cast it on the same ship. So lets say That I have a fleet, of Serven Overseer and I hit there Reactive Nanite Armor button on the fleet. Each ship will target an different ship, so that there abilitie, comes, to it full effect. This would Radiance Battleship,as there animosity abilitie could then be split between a group of Radiance(which is other reason for a fleet AI).

Offenive ailities is something, that we will have to test. Should hitting the button, make all the ships, of the same type, use that abilitie, on one ship or a group? Should it be all the ship of the same type or the best one for the job?

I agree with the "making your character" idea, it would be pretty cool and would immerse players more...

I'd like 2 keyboard shortcuts.
--select all bombers in system
--select all fighters in system

please? launching all of either fighters or bombers while docking the other, hot-keying them, and then doing the reverse becomes tedious once you start moving your forces around.

never mind