Most of the news I see is not about Michigan. That is despite its population being in the same league as Australia.
Europeans consider themselves "worldly" because a German knows what's happening in France or in a former colony. It's no different wherever you go. There's less than two dozen million Australians. Of course most of their news is going to be about what's happening elsewhere.
I doubt the average European is any more informed on what's happening in say Japan than the average American, for instance.
The problem with Europeans and Australians when they do their news rants is that they are doing an apples and oranges comparison. The typical European country has less than 10% the population of the United States and even less its GDP. More things happen in the US than in Europe -- whether that be in business, science, technology, foreign policy, entertainment, etc.
Spare me the "listening to the foreign news". The BBC world service has time to cover Cricket scores in India. I've had this debate hundreds of times over the years and I've never been able to get someoen to provide a relevant example of REAL news that is not picked up in the US that was covered in Europe or Australia. Feel free to take the challenge.
America bashing is certainly an amusing passtime. I like taking part myself. But when you get to the brass tacks of it, the US is the world's leading information provider by far. Next time you're on Google or Yahoo or CNN or MSNBC or wherever, ask yourself, what country does this service come from? Yet somehow these sources of information are inferior to the BBC or some other state provided news source.
Try this excercise too: Go to news.bbc.co.uk. What do you see? Just glancing it's top story is CIA chief quits, Iraqi news, , hell Michael Moore is on the freaking home page of News.bbc.co.uk. Yea, we Americans are missing a lot. Of course, Tunisia oposition leader being jailed may not show up on the front page of CNN but that's not exactly earth shattering.