I am reasonably familiar with Mosaic Law and it was brutal but I don't hear about too many Jews getting stoned now days for walking too far on the Sabbath. On the other hand, you can still loose a hand if you are a thief under Sharia law. It is barbaric, and it is way out of date. |
I have no answer as to "why". It is beyond me, and my ability to comprehend where the honor is. And as Cacto points out, it appears to die out once the people are taken out of a certain environment (2nd generation).
It is also true that other religions (your example of Hindus - toothache's example against Mormons) are not pure in that regard. But what I cant understand are the people that try to excuse and/or dismiss this behaviour "because so and so did it as well". That is so assinine. Yes, Christians DID it. There are so many things wrong with that statement that it sometimes floors me more than the acts themsevles.
First, note the tense. Are we to continually bring up past holocausts to explain current ones that have no relation in intent or action? That is again excusing the perpertrators for the crimes, just because "they (someone in some period of time) did it too".
Second, the statement cries out that 2 wrongs must make a right. If the speaker does not beleive that, then why are they bringing up a past crime whose perpertrators have long turned to dust? To show that 2 wrongs now make a right?
There is no excuse for these acts, and excusing/explaining them with a litany of past or current injustices is only enabling future acts. But unfortunately, in western society today, it is not enough to have a moral compass to live by. We must encompass all the other morals of other societies into our own and not condemn that which we do not understand, regardless of what our perceived values tell us is morally wrong and repugnant.
I dont know what is worse. The cretins who think there is such a concept as an Honor Killing - or the clowns who would have us believe we must accept/excuse it because we do not understand their culture.