Reply #1 I've been using SuSE since v 8.0.
I had grown very accustom to the KDE interface, and decided one day to try the GNOME front end. It lasted less than a week.
Maybe I'll give it another shot someday, but I found it quite awkward. Not because of the interface itself, but because of what I was used to.
What advantages are you finding? |
I use Slackware. I have KDE, Gnome, Fluxbox (my favorite), and XFCE4 which I can switch back and forth on at will. I prefer the speed of Fluxbox, but also enjoy playing with the KDE and Gnome eye candy.
Gnome isn't bad once you get used to it and set it up to work the way you want. The first thing I always do is get rid of the double click crap. I like a single click to activate items. It's easy enough to change.
I don't think there are any real advantages of Gnome over KDE or visa versa, they're just something different. They're both resource hogs to a certain extent (eye candy isn't free). Gnome is a tad worse in that respect, using slightly more memory. I do like the fact that Gnome applies config settings changes immediately instead of waiting for you to click apply. Just saves a step.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other. I've always thought of KDE as being more like a Windows DE and Gnome being more like a MAC DE.